Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 62
Filter
1.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 46(2): 101-105, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20242163

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of ocular conveyance of SARS-CoV-2 has been well described for severe/hospitalized cases, but scarcely reported in asymptomatic and non-severe patients, who are unaware that they are carriers. MATERIAL & METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study quantitatively evaluated SARS-CoV-2 shedding on the ocular surface (OS). Conjunctival testing was suggested to all hospital personnel being screened by nasopharyngeal (NP) SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Disease symptoms were evaluated using a standardized questionnaire and telephone follow-up 6±3 months later for disease evolution (recovery with/without severe disease). RESULTS: Four hundred and eighty seven patients were included. From 46 NP SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects (cycle threshold [CT]=24.2±7.1), 13% tested positive at the OS (CT=36.4±2.8). Most SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects were symptomatic (n=40, 87%), while 6 were asymptomatic (being tested as contact cases). Systemic symptoms were not significantly different in OS-positive vs OS-negative subjects, although headache tended to be more frequent in OS-positives (83% vs 54%, P=0.06). None of the OS-positive subjects reported ocular symptoms and none developed severe disease requiring hospitalization or oxygen therapy. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 shedding at the OS may occur in asymptomatic and non-severe COVID-19 individuals (including those absent of ocular symptoms). However, the high RT-PCR CT values attained may indicate a low risk of transmissibility via this route.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prospective Studies , Conjunctiva
2.
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine ; 33(3):e95, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2322715

ABSTRACT

History: Twenty-two year old male basic trainee was brought to the ED after collapsing during a routine ruck march. At mile 8/12, soldier was noted to develop an unsteady gate and had witnessed loss of consciousness. A rectal core temperature was obtained and noted to be >107degreeF. Cooling initiated with ice sheets and EMS was activated. On arrival to the ED, patient demonstrated confusion and persistently elevated core temperatures despite ice sheeting, chilled saline and cold water bladder lavage. Cooling measures were discontinued after patient achieved euthermia in the ED;however, his temperatures subsequently spiked>103degreeF. Given rebound hyperthermia, an endovascular cooling (EVC) device was placed in the right femoral vein and patient was transferred to the ICU. Multiple attempts to place EVC device on standby were unsuccessful with subsequent rebound hyperthermia. Prolonged cooling was required. Physical Exam: VS: HR 121, BP 85/68, RR 22 SpO2 100% RA, Temp 102.4degreeF Gen: young adult male, NAD, shivering, A&Ox2 (person and place only) HEENT: Scleral anicteric, conjunctiva non-injected, moist mucus membranes Neck: Supple, no LAD Chest: CTAB, no wheezes/rales/rhonchi CV: tachycardia, regular rhythm, normal S1, S2 without murmurs, rubs, gallops ABD: NABS, soft/non-distended, no guarding or rebound EXT: No LE edema, tenderness SKIN: blisters with broad erythematous bases on bilateral heels Neuro: CN II-XII grossly intact, 5/5 strength in all extremities. Differential Diagnosis: 216. Septic Shock 217. Hypothalamic Stroke 218. Exertional Heat Stroke (EHS) 219. Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome 220. Thyroid Storm Test Results: CBC: 18.2>14.5/40.6<167 CMP: 128/3.5 88/1831/2.7<104, AST 264, ALT 80, Ca 8.8 Lactate: 7.1 CK: 11 460 Myoglobin: 18 017 TSH: 3.16 CXR: No acute cardiopulmonary process Blood Cx: negative x2 CSF Cx: Negative COVID/Influenza/EBV: Negative Brain MRI: wnl. Final Diagnosis: Exertional Heat Stroke. Discussion(s): No EVC protocols exist for the management of EHS or rebound/refractory hyperthermia. As a result, the protocol used for this patient was adapted from post-cardiac arrest cooling protocols. It is unclear if this adapted protocol contributed to his delayed cooling and rebound hyperthermia as it was not intended for this patient demographic/ pathophysiology. Furthermore, despite initiating empiric antibiotics upon admission, delayed recognition and tailored therapy for his bilateral ankle cellulitis may have contributed to the difficulty in achieving euthermia. In summary, more research needs to be done to evaluate and develop an EVC protocol for EHS. Outcome(s): Euthermia was achieved and maintained after 36 hours of continuous EVC, at which point it was discontinued. His CK, AST/ALT, creatinine and sodium down-trended after discontinuation of EVC. Patient's antibiotics were transitioned to an oral formulation for treatment of ankle cellulitis and he was prepared for discharge. He was discharged with regular follow-up with the Fort Benning Heat Clinic. Follow-Up: After discharge, patient had regularly scheduled visits with the Fort Benning Heat Clinic. His typical lab markers for exertional heat stroke were regularly monitored. He had continued resolution of his Rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney injury and hyponatremia with typical treatment. Soldier returned to duty after 10 weeks of close monitoring and rehabilitation.

3.
Journal of Investigative Medicine ; 71(1):272, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2319228

ABSTRACT

Case Report: A 28 year old male with a past medical history of hypothyroidism and positive ANA presented to an outpatient dermatology clinic with a diffuse pruritic rash two weeks after the administration of his first Moderna COVID booster vaccine. He denied any other accompanying symptoms such as fever or chills as well as any similar rashes to prior doses of the Moderna COVID vaccine. The rash consisted of pink erythematous minimally scaly papules, thin plaques and patches involving the left and right dorsal hands, forearms, wrists, face, neck and left shoulder. The remainder of the patient's skin including the bilateral lower extremities, the eyelids, conjunctiva and oral mucosa was clear. The patient denied any similar rashes in the past. The patient denied any allergies to medications, or food or environmental allergies. He denied any notable contact allergen exposures, including to soaps, lotions, and cosmetic products. The patient also denied any significant family history or past surgical history. The patient was on Armour Thyroid for hypothyroidism and testosterone for low levels since age eighteen. The patient was started on cetirizine 10 mg once daily for the rash with minimal improvement. Autoimmune workup for the rash was notable for an elevated anti-RNP and as the patient's past medical history included Raynaud's phenomenon and ANA positivity for ten years, the patient was diagnosed with mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD). Autoimmune conditions can often have an indolent course, where symptoms progressively develop and worsen. MCTD is an autoimmune overlap syndrome that can consist of the following three connective tissue diseases: systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, and polymyositis. Millions of individuals across the world are receiving COVID vaccines to protect themselves and members of their community, and it is of utmost importance that we continue to investigate adverse events. Although of low incidence, these rare effects have the ability to impact large numbers of people within both healthy and immunocompromised populations. It is critical that we examine and document them in a rigorous manner, to ensure safe vaccine delivery and reassure the public about vaccine safety overall.

4.
Telehealth and Medicine Today ; 7(5), 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2289151

ABSTRACT

This narative challenges readers to discuss a diagnosis of a suspicious lesion during a telemedicine consultation in the era of COVID-19.

5.
BMJ Open Ophthalmol ; 5(1): e000630, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2247833

ABSTRACT

The 2019 novel coronavirus which causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) known as SARS-CoV-2 still remains as a global pandemic since its discovery and continues to spread across the world, given how highly contagious the virus is. We reviewed various articles that explore eye involvement in COVID-19 and other human coronaviruses, its human manifestations in comparison to animal studies and potential mechanism of viral entry into the eye surface. Evidence of animal studies depicted various complications of coronaviruses infection into the eyes, in both anterior and posterior segments of the eye. Conjunctival inflammation remains uncommon in association with COVID-19, with other ophthalmic findings. The risk of transmission via the ocular surface remains likely low, though it is inarguably present based on preliminary finding of viral load in ocular samples and expression of ACE2 on the ocular surface. Testing the tears sample for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 was unreliable due to limitations of the testing kits and conflicting evidence of the viral titre in the ocular samples. Further larger, more precise and specific studies are required to allow us to better understand the pattern of virulence underlying the associations of SARS-CoV-2 in the eye despite its rare occurrence. This review article aims to enhance better awareness among clinicians regarding ocular manifestations associated with COVID-19 and necessary precautions should be implemented to minimise the risk of person-to-person especially in the nosocomial setting.

6.
International Journal of Bio resource and Stress Management ; 13(12):1417-1424, 2022.
Article in English | CAB Abstracts | ID: covidwho-2262901

ABSTRACT

The eyes, which were not previously the subject of investigation, have emerged as one of the more intriguing aspect of COVID-19 infection. The probable pathways for SARS-CoV-2 infection through the eyes are either through the tear film and draining tear ducts leading to the upper respiratory tract and gastrointestinal tract, or through the conjunctiva into limbal superficial cells into the inner eye, where distribution via the blood or nervous system appears to be possible. Virus pathogenesis through tear and conjunctiva has been established in animal models of several coronavirus eye diseases, and preliminary research have shown that SARS-CoV-2 may do the same in humans. Given that COVID-19 cases have reached pandemic proportions and are on the rise, it is vital to recognize the illness's ocular manifestations and avert potentially vision-threatening effects. Coronaviruses may be transmitted between animals and humans through evolution, therefore investigating them in animal models could be crucial in the future to discover further elements of ocular involvement. It is recommended that health care and individual personnel take steps to avoid infection and limit viral transmission. More study is needed to understand the transmission pathways and the alternatives for COVID-19 prevention and therapy disseminated through the ocular surfaces for prompt recovery of the patients.

7.
Ocul Immunol Inflamm ; : 1-7, 2021 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2241968

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA in postmortem ocular specimens of patients with severe COVID-19 disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmortem conjunctival (28 samples), aqueous humor (30 samples) and vitreous humor (30 samples) specimens were obtained bilaterally from the eyes of 15 deceased COVID-19 patients within one hour of death. The presence of viral RNA was evaluated in samples using Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS: Positive RT-PCR SARS-COV-2 results were found in one conjunctival and 2 vitreous humor samples. All aqueous humor samples tested negative for the presence of SARS-COV-2 RNA. Of note, three positive samples were obtained from three different patients. The overall prevalence of positive RT-PCR ocular samples was 3.4% among all samples and 20% at the patient level. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 RNA is detectable in postmortem conjunctival and vitreous humor samples of patients with severe COVID-19.

8.
American Journal of the Medical Sciences ; 365(Supplement 1):S26, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2235935

ABSTRACT

Case Report:We present a 5-year-old male with two days of fever, cough, vomiting, and loose stools. His history is significant for premature birth (35 weeks gestational age) and shunted hydrocephalus. A ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt was placed 6 days prior to presentation. Parental report included episodes of post-tussive, nonbloody, non-bilious emesis, poor oral intake, tachypnea, and increased work of breathing. Physical examination demonstrated a dehydrated infant with sunken fontanelles. He had no notable rash, no lymphadenopathy, and clear conjunctiva. His VP shunt site appeared normal without swelling or erythema. Initial evaluation showed elevated inflammatory markers -ESR 51 and CRP 12.32 mg/dL. A viral respiratory PCR panel returned positive for coronavirus (not SARS-CoV-2). A head CT scan and shunt radiography series showed no abnormalities with his shunt. The following morning, Radiology reported an incidental retropharyngeal fluid collection on a re-read of the patient's initial CT scan. A neck CT was obtained and demonstrated a fluid pocket with secondary mass effect in addition to bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy. Screening blood cultures were negative. The patient remained febrile (tmax 103.6F) and developed a transaminitis (ALT 264.9, AST 654), elevated fibrinogen 476, elevated INR 1.4, and low albumin 2.1. Abdominal ultrasound showed a normal the liver and biliary tract. His transaminitis resolved without treatment. The next day, the patient developed lip erythema and conjunctival injection. An echocardiogram showed a dilated right coronary artery (z-score of 3.59) and his inflammatory markers (ESR 26, CRP 9.63) remained elevated. Treatment was initiated with IVIG and moderate-dose aspirin. The patient defervesced, and he remained afebrile for over 48 hours prior to discharge. A repeat echocardiogram 2 days later showed a slight reduction in coronary artery dilatation (z-score 3.39). Hewas discharged on lowdose aspirin, and followed up with cardiology as an outpatient. Kawasaki's Disease (KD) is most common in children from ages 1 to 4 years and is classically characterized by persistent fever with a constellation of symptoms including limbal sparing conjunctivitis, cervical lymphadenopathy, polymorphous rash, strawberry tongue, oral changes, and extremity changes. Our patient presented at a younger age with a concurrent diagnosis of coronavirus upper respiratory tract infection. His atypical hospital course and incidental finding of retropharyngeal edema and transaminitis increased the clinical suspicion for KD. His symptoms rapidly improved after administration of IVIG. Younger patients are at an increased risk for severe complications of KD including coronary aneurysm. KD has been shown in the literature to have an association with coronavirus infection as well as presentation with retropharyngeal edema. Clinicians should consider KD in their differential even if patients do not meet all criteria for diagnosis on initial presentation. Copyright © 2023 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation.

9.
International Eye Science ; 22(12):2105-2110, 2022.
Article in Chinese | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2201261

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID - 19) is caused by novel coronavirus (SARS - CoV - 2), which is widely prevalent around the world and caused global panic. Evidences show that eye transmission is possible, so the ophthalmic medical staff is more likely to be infected. Ocular manifestations of COVID - 19 involve conjunctiva, corneal, sclera, anterior chamber, pupils, retina, optic nerve and visual cortex, extraocular muscles and theirs cranial nerves innervation, orbit and lacrimal system. Viral conjunctivitis is the most common ocular manifestation of COVID-19. In order to protect ophthalmic medical staff from infection and to safely carry out clinical work during the epidemic period of COVID-19, this article summarizes the ocular manifestations of COVID - 19, including epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical manifestation. Copyright © 2022 International Journal of Ophthalmology (c/o Editorial Office). All rights reserved.

10.
Physiol Int ; 2022 Nov 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2140903

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) resulted in a worldwide pandemic, due to its great capacity to invade the human body. Previous studies have shown that the primary route of invasion of this virus is the human respiratory tract via the co-expression of ACE2 receptor and TMPRSS2, a serine protease on the cellular surface. Interestingly, this condition is present not only on the respiratory epithelium but on the conjunctival mucosa, as well. Thus, we hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 is present on the conjunctival mucosa. Aim: To prove that SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in the conjunctiva. Methods: Previously nasopharyngeal swab-sample based real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive COVID-19 infected patients were selected at the COVID Care Centers of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. The study was approved by the ethical committee of Semmelweis University. During their recovery, both nasopharyngeal and conjunctival swab-samples were taken and PCR method was used to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed. Results: The study population consisted of 97 patients, 49 females (50.5%) and 48 males (49.5%), with a mean age of 67.2 ± 11.9 years. During recovery, with nasopharyngeal swabs, the PCR test was positive in 55 cases (56.70%), whereas with conjunctival swabs it was positive in 8 cases (8.25%). Both tests were positive in 5 cases (5.15%). In some patients, ocular symptoms were observed as well. The rest of the patients (29 cases) had negative nasopharyngeal PCR tests during recovery. Conclusions: Although only in few cases, the data of the present study provides a proof of concept that SARS-CoV-2 can be present on the conjunctival mucosa even in nasopharyngeal negative patients, a finding, which can have clinical importance. Also, on the basis of these findings one can hypothesize that - in addition to the respiratory tract - the conjunctiva can be an entrance route for SARS-CoV-2 to the human body. Thus, in high-risk conditions, in addition to covering the mouth and nose with mask, the protection of the eyes is also strongly recommended.

11.
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science ; 63(7):3987-A0267, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2058482

ABSTRACT

Purpose : 10% of COVID patients have eye symptoms1 . Conjunctivitis is the most reported ocular symptom, being reported in 88.8% of all pts with eye symptoms1 . Literature search for SARS-CoV-2 presence in the conjunctiva of COVID patients with conjunctivitis. Methods : Review of articles dated 2020-2021 for conjunctival swabs in COVID-19 positive conjunctivitis patients using search terms: “COVID conjunctival swabs,” “COVID conjunctivitis,” and “COVID and eyes”. Search was done on Google Scholar and PubMed. Cases were excluded if patients did not have conjunctivitis or if a positive conjunctival swab was found in a patient with no clinical or lab-confirmed COVID diagnosis. Results : 27 articles published February 2020-December 2021 were found with 223 conjunctivitis patients. We found that conjunctival swabs tested for SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR returned positive 54.4% of the time in COVID-19 patients with conjunctivitis. We also found that 18 patients with no conjunctivitis tested positive on conjunctival swabs. Conclusions : Further research is needed to study the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 in the eyes and its presence on the ocular surface. As we begin our third year of the pandemic, we expect more case reports and clinical studies on COVID conjunctivitis.

12.
Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases ; 10(3), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2044162

ABSTRACT

Context: Coronaviruses are the largest RNA viruses associated with some ocular manifestations. There are various contradictory reports about the ocular manifestations of coronaviruses in humans. Different ocular tissues can affect coronavirus-associated infectious diseases. Evidence Acquisition: All manuscripts were collected from PubMed, Google Scholar, and other relevant databases. All searches were done by specific keywords, including "coronavirus," "ocular disease," and "eye." Results: There are various contradictory reports about the ocular effects of coronaviruses in humans. Different ocular tissues are involved in coronavirus-associated infectious diseases. The ductal connection between the upper respiratory tract and eye mucosa through the nasolacrimal duct can be an entrance to respiratory viruses, such as coronaviruses. The coronavirus can infect the retina, conjunctiva, cornea, and uvea of the eye. The primary SARS-CoV-2 receptor, ACE2, is mainly expressed in the posterior tissues of the eye, such as the retina and RPE. Feline CoV, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) are responsible for conjunctiva involvement in coronavirus-related ocular pathogenesis. Also, various studies are held on COVID-19 and the impact of the conjunctiva on diagnosis and medical complications. Given that the cornea has an acceptable expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 genes compared to lung tissue, some studies were done on the impact of the cornea in COVID-19. Feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) is also related to uvea complications. The experiments of human and animal models on the effects of coronaviruses on the retina and cornea in the event of various epidemics of coronaviruses and new and unknown ocular complications can be of great help to future studies. Conclusions: Given the importance of investigating the pathogenesis and other routes of SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in areas other than the respiratory tract, this report attempts to highlight the importance of eye infections caused by the virus, its role in maintaining the virus transmission chain, and its impact on public health.

13.
Journal of the Intensive Care Society ; 23(1):94-96, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2043037

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Ocular complications in critically ill patients is common. Up to 42% of intensive care unit patients can have signs of damage to the corneal surface of the eye (exposure keratopathy), which can lead to secondary complications and ultimately irreversible visual loss1,2 (Rosenberg and Eisen, 2008;Bird et al, 2017). Emergence of COVID-19 pandemic has meant increased number of critical care admission with inherent risk of ocular complication owing to need for non-invasive ventilation, mechanical ventilation and prone ventilation. All these factors have resurfaced need for increased awareness and adherence to national standards related to eye care in critical care3 (Royal college of Ophthalmology and Intensive Care Society joint Ophthalmic service guidance). Objectives: To study baseline knowledge and awareness of eye care practices in neuro critical care unit. To measure compliance of national eye care guidance. Methods: Structured online survey for critical care nurses. Review of hospital IT software to study snapshot of eye care compliance. Results: We ran baseline survey of neuro critical care nurses on knowledge and current practice of eye care in ICU. Eye care complications in ICU are common with 1 in 5 individual reporting > 3 ocular complications in last 3 months. Three-quarter of individuals reported to have good to very good knowledge of eye care protocol with 66% aware of current national guidance. 86% of respondents assessed lagophthalmos while 76% assessed conjunctiva and cornea routinely. On the flipside however only 60% routinely documented eye care measures in clinical practice. Importantly, 96% responded that they would benefit from education and training in eye care practices. Review of hospital records for eye care compliance and documentation validated the findings on the survey. We found 68% compliance rate for assessment of lagophthalmos in all admitted patient in neuro critical care unit. There was 100% compliance to institution of protective measures and appropriate escalation to medical staff. Graph 1: Baseline survey of knowledge and practice of Eye care in Neuro Critical Care Unit depicting a stepladder pattern in knowledge, practice and documentation of Eye care. Conclusion: Knowledge and awareness of eye care practices fall below national guidance. There is clear gap in knowledge, practice and documentation of eye care practices. Incorporation of eye care module in continuous training program and use of cognitive aids may help to further improve compliance and documentation of eye care practice in future.

14.
NeuroQuantology ; 20(8):5821-5834, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2010514

ABSTRACT

Public health and societal efforts can avoid the 2019 Corona pandemic (COVID-19). Ethiopia has adopted health and social measures. COVID-19 social distance and health prevention research. SARS-CoV-2 produces COVID-19. The global vaccine effort must understand how the virus spreads to end the pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 spreads by respiratory droplets and aerosols, according to new studies. Temperature, humidity, precipitation, air currents, pH, and radiation affect transmission. Hand washing and masks are also helpful public health measures. Non-pharmaceutical remedies need more research. Body-invading eye bacteria exist. There's no indication that COVID-19 exposure causes the disorder's ocular symptoms. Tears and conjunctiva contained SARS-CoV-2. Ocular symptoms may be the first or only sign of infection. Hand cleanliness, social isolation, and hospital SOPs can limit illness spread. Eye lubricants and spectacles can prevent eye infections.

15.
Medecine d'Afrique Noire ; 69(7):441-449, 2022.
Article in French | GIM | ID: covidwho-1998443

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Infectious conjunctivitis is a frequent condition in ophthalmology consultations. The evolutionary mode, the contagious character and the socio-economic and epidemiological stakes especially during the current period of world health crisis with the coronavirus disease are the reasons for this study. The aim of this work is to describe the epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic profile of infectious conjunctivitis during the study period in order to improve management. Materials and methods: This retrospective, descriptive and analytical study concerned patients examined between March 1st, 2019, and March 1st, 2021, in the ophthalmology department of the regional hospital of Garoua in northern Cameroon. Patients of all ages who presented with conjunctivitis suspected of infectious origin were included. To define the causes of conjunctival infections, we relied solely on clinical findings. The following variables were analyzed for each case: age, sex, symptoms, contact, laterality, character of signs, aetiology and type of treatment received, class of antibiotics administered, duration and cost of treatment. All patients with incomplete records and non-infectious conjunctivitis were excluded.

16.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc ; 2022 Jul 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1974610

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: To quantify the hemodynamic and thrombotic effect of COVID-19 on the eye microcirculation of patients with thromboprophylaxis, shortly after hospital discharge. METHODS: This case-control study included 17 COVID-19 survivors (named "COVID-19 Group") and 17 healthy volunteers (named "Control Group"). Axial blood velocity (Vax) and percentage of occluded vessels (POV) were quantified by Conjunctival Video Capillaroscopy (CVC). Microvessels were identified and classified as "capillaries" (CAP), "postcapillary venules of size 1" (PC1), and "postcapillary venules of size 2" (PC2). RESULTS: The COVID-19 Group did not differ significantly in basic demographics from the Control Group. In the COVID-19 Group, there was a statistically significant (p <  0.001) reduction of Vax (39%, 49% and 47%, for CAP, PC1, and PC2, respectively) in comparison to the Control Group and a sizeable (p <  0.001) increase of POV (600%) in comparison to the Control Group. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 not only reduces significantly axial blood velocity in the capillaries and postcapillary venules of the eye but has also a devastating effect on microthrombosis (POV) despite thromboprophylaxis treatment. This gives a possible explanation for long COVID and a hint about the existence of a possibly unknown coagulation factor.

17.
Viruses ; 14(7)2022 06 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1917791

ABSTRACT

Infectious diseases of the conjunctiva and cornea usually leave behind both broad local and systemic immunity. Case reports of SARS-CoV-2-positive conjunctivitis with subsequent systemic immunity suggest a new route of immunization preventing the primary infection of the airways. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 24 Syrian field hamsters were treated. In systematic animal experiments, we infected the eyes of n = 8 animals (group 1) and the airways of another n = 8 animals (group 2) with SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan type); n = 8 hamsters served as controls (group 3). The weight development of the animals was recorded. After two weeks of observation of disease symptoms, all animals were re-exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in the respiratory tract (challenge) to determine whether immunity to the virus had been achieved. RESULTS: The epi-ocularly infected animals (group 1) showed no clinically visible disease during the ocular infection phase. At most, there was a slightly reduced weight gain compared to the control group (group 3), while the respiratory infected animals (group 2) all lost weight, became lethargic, and slowly recovered after two weeks. After the challenge, none of the animals in groups 1 and 2 became ill again. The animals in the negative control (group 3) all became ill. Cytotoxic antibodies were detectable in the blood of the infected groups before and after challenge, with higher titers in the epi-ocularly infected animals. CONCLUSION: By epi-ocular infection with SARS-CoV-2, the development of systemic immunity with formation of cytotoxic antibodies without severe general disease could be observed in the experimental animals, which did not induce any more disease upon a second infection in the respiratory tract. Therefore, it can be concluded that a purely epi-ocular infection with SARS-CoV2 only induces a weak disease pattern followed by systemic immunity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Eye Infections , Animals , COVID-19/prevention & control , Conjunctiva , Cricetinae , Immunization , Mesocricetus , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2
18.
Stem Cell Reports ; 17(7): 1699-1713, 2022 07 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1907809

ABSTRACT

Conjunctival epithelial cells, which express viral-entry receptors angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and transmembrane protease serine type 2 (TMPRSS2), constitute the largest exposed epithelium of the ocular surface tissue and may represent a relevant viral-entry route. To address this question, we generated an organotypic air-liquid-interface model of conjunctival epithelium, composed of basal, suprabasal, and superficial epithelial cells, and fibroblasts, which could be maintained successfully up to day 75 of differentiation. Using single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), with complementary imaging and virological assays, we observed that while all conjunctival cell types were permissive to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genome expression, a productive infection did not ensue. The early innate immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in conjunctival cells was characterised by a robust autocrine and paracrine NF-κB activity, without activation of antiviral interferon signalling. Collectively, these data enrich our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 infection at the human ocular surface, with potential implications for the design of preventive strategies and conjunctival transplantation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Humans , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/genetics , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/metabolism , Receptors, Virus/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2
19.
BMJ Open Ophthalmol ; 7(1)2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1868736

ABSTRACT

In addition to catastrophic loss of life, and dramatic and unwanted alterations to the daily lives of those left behind, the COVID-19 pandemic has fostered the publication and dissemination of an unprecedented quantity of peer-reviewed medical and scientific publications on a single subject. In particular, the ophthalmic literature is now replete with clinical and laboratory studies on putative eye involvement by SARS-CoV-2, the aetiologic agent of COVID-19. In this review, we critically appraise the published literature on COVID-19, and suggest that the quality of scientific peer review and editorial decision-making also suffered during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Eye , Humans , Pandemics , Peer Review , SARS-CoV-2
20.
European Journal of Molecular and Clinical Medicine ; 7(8):5423-5434, 2020.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1857021

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 (Corona Virus Diseases-2019) is the newest global pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2). This article aims to study the relationship between COVID-19 and the conjunctival swab test systemically. This article is based on several scientific reports related to conjunctival swab performed in COVID-19 patients from the PUBMED database, Google Scholar, Springer Link, Elsevier, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and Wiley Online Library. Keywords used are conjunctivitis, ocular, ophthalmic, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, 2019-nCoV, Coronavirus, Coronavirus-19, Coronavirus19, pathophysiology, mechanisms, tear, conjunctival swab, RT-PCR, and conjunctiva. Eight reports were reviewed in this article. Respiratory symptoms and ocular manifestation such as conjunctivitis with hyperemic eyes, conjunctival chemosis, epiphora, and other rare ocular manifestations were observed in COVID-19 patients. Ocular manifestation may present as a sole symptom, prodromal symptom, simultaneously appear with the systemic symptom, or as residual floaters. Various therapy was given according to the complaints. RT-PCR results from the conjunctival swab test may be positive and negative in COVID-19 patients with conjunctivitis. From this article, we hope to highlight the importance to take optimal prevention measures for medical staff despite the presence or absence of ocular clinical manifestation.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL